Main | March 2007 »

February 26, 2007

Entrepreneurial Surge and Rise of the Part-Time Entrepreneur

Fortune Small Business reports that “we are in the midst of the largest entrepreneurial surge this country has ever seen. According to Small Business Administration projections, nearly 672,000 new companies with employees were created in 2005. That is the biggest business birthrate in U.S. history: 30,000 more startups than in 2004, and 12% more than at the height of dot-com hysteria in 1996.”

“Recent immigrants … in 2005 started 25% more companies per capita than native-born citizens did.” 

Carl Schramm, head of the Kauffman Foundation and author of The Entrepreneurial Imperative, points out that continually dropping technology costs make startup money less necessary now that entrepreneurs often can purchase powerful computers and software without maxing out their credit cards.

FSB also notes a new trend of “part time” company founders, because it has become easier for entrepreneurs to start new companies without quitting their day jobs. Small Business Administration (SBA) figures indicate that the number of firms with no employees grew by 26% from 1997 to 2004, to 19 million. Slightly than half of them are run by workers with another primary source of income.

February 23, 2007

IP Investment Houses - Corporate Dealmaker's Top 5

TheDeal.com discusses the "Big 5" intellectual property investment houses: Intellectual Ventures (led by former Microsoft CTO Nathan Myrvold), Acacia Technologies Group, the Ocean Tomo Capital Fund, Altitude Capital and the Deutsche Bank Patent Fund.

Marketer Bitten by Creative Commons License?

Marketing guru Seth Godin, author of The Bootstrapper's Bible: How to Start and Build a Business With a Great Idea and (Almost) No Money and many others about marketing and blogging, published an ebook titled Everyone's an Expert (About Something): The Search for Meaning Online.

The title page of the ebook says that "Copyright holder is licensing this under the Creative Commons license, Attribution 2.5.  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/".  According to Creative Commons,  that license "lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered, in terms of what others can do with your works licensed under Attribution." 

Fine, right?

Yes, until an email from Amazon.com announced that an unknown publisher was offering his ebook for sale as a new book.  Those two words in the license, "even commercially," meant that Godin had granted the rights to anyone to resell the book, as long as he received attribution as the author.

In a recent posting on his blog (Please Don't Buy This Book), he says "I fully realize that the Creative Commons license I chose permits someone to sell the ebook or even turn it into a book. I had no problem with that. My concern was that the book was being passed off as something new. That my trademark (and your expectations) were violated when Amazon sent out an email indicating that in 2007 I had a new book come out on this topic. The news is that the publisher of the book was incredibly responsive and has changed the cover.  He's being really clear about the origin of the book now, and that was my point all along."  Plus Godin received some good publicity, including a brief mention in The New York Times.

The takeaway: Others won't be so fortunate.  It pays to read and understand the licenses that you grant, even if they are short or look "standard".

By the way, Godin is still making the ebook available for download for free.

 

 

February 16, 2007

Immigrant Entrepreneurs have an Overlooked but Significant Impact

Business Week Online, in The Impact of Immigrant Entrepreneurs by Kerry Miller, cites recent studies showing the critical role that skilled immigrants play in the economy, but notes that those immigrant entrepreneurs and their economic impact often are overlooked.  Immigrant-founded companies include Google, Yahoo!, and eBay.

On Feb. 6 the Center for an Urban Future, a New York City think tank, said that immigrant entrepreneurs are overlooked contributors to cities' economies, and that more businesses are being started by foreign-born than native-born entrepreneurs in major cities.  BW points out that “the entrepreneurial spirit of immigrants is a well-documented phenomenon—immigrants have been more likely to be self-employed than native-born residents in every U.S. census since 1880.”  1880, not 1980 -- truly a long term trend.

Many foreign-born entrepreneurs often achieve success on their own, without access to the help of formal business services, according to BW.  It doesn't need to be that way, especially for legal services.

February 15, 2007

How to Draft a Specification or Requirements Document for a Contract

Many licenses and independent contractor agreements require a technical specification or requirements document describing the software or web service that one party must deliver to the other.  Specifications and requirements are the standard to determine whether the developer has met its obligations, and therefore will be paid.  They're obviously critical.

For major software or internet projects, the review process (with comments from departments such as Product Management and Marketing, Sales, Engineering, Customer Support, and last but not least, Legal) assures that the specification almost writes itself.  (Whether it is a good specification for a great product is never assured.)

It’s a different story for smaller projects.  Sometimes product leaders or engineers calls me, saying they must produce a spec for a contract and don’t know where to start.  Time and resources don’t justify a detailed review.  They’ve been told that “everyone knows what’s needed” and they “only have to put it down on paper.”  When facing that blank sheet (or empty screen), they just freeze up.

Here are some suggestions:

  • Describe what the product is intended to do.
  • Describe the hardware, software, connectivity (e.g. type and speed of network connection) and protocols / Application Programming Interfaces (API’s) required for the product to operate.  Does the user need to obtain these separately (either via purchase or an open source license)?  Are certain vendors or brands required?  Don’t forget to specify operating systems and platforms, processor speed, and RAM and disk storage space needed.  Tie the spec to current versions.  Frequently the required third party components will be updated, which breaks the product.  Is the developer required to fix the product to deal with the updates; can the developer charge extra for this?
  • Spell out the user environment and limitations, such as limits on the number of users, concurrent users, database records and database inquiries.
  • Response time limitations generally are important.  It may not be worth specifying them too precisely, though.
  • Security, privacy and encryption features can create a poor user experience and even result in legal liability because they are regulated by U.S. federal and state law and foreign law.  Be sure to consider these issues, or consult an attorney who can.
  • Does the design or architecture have inherent limitations?  Better to say so now than to second guess and argue later.
  • In general, try to write down any important but unstated assumptions.
  • Mockup screen shots often are helpful, but too much detail can be cumbersome and reduce the flexibility of the development effort.
  • If the spec relies on another document (e.g. a standard), be sure to identify it clearly by name, version number and date. 
  • Describe any special test protocols or testing required.

Here are some examples, with various levels of detail:

  • Intel published a White Paper, "Technical Specifications in the Public Procurement of Computers" (2006), which describes various high level requirements.
  • The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) has published recommended practices for software requirements specifications (IEEE STD 830-1998) and a guide to software requirements specifications (IEEE STD 830-1994).  As a lawyer, I don't compare my clients' documents against this standard.  Please comment or let me know if you have had good or poor experiences with this standard.
  • Writing Software Requirements Specifications by Donn Le Vie, Jrexplains the basics of the IEEE 830-1998 standard, suggests how to extend it and make it more useful, and includes several templates.  Ken Rigby has published a useful but very bare-bones template.  Of course, you can also do a web search for "software requirements specification" and similar terms.
  • Legal issues may require a different level of detail than a developer otherwise would provide solely for technical reasons.  For example, if the product uses unproven technology, the specification may need less detail so that the developer has legal "wiggle room" for changes during the development effort. 1

    Open source compliance provider Black Duck receives additional financing

    Black Duck Software, a provider of open source compliance software, has just closed a new round of financing, according to TheDeal.com.  Black Duck's products are used to locate open source code used in a company's software.

    Douglas Levin, president and CEO of Black Duck, said in the article, "We have crossed the point at which companies are reluctant to use open source." 

    The article says that Black Duck has seen particularly fast growth -- 849% growth in the number of customer accounts in 2006 -- thanks to merger activity, with its potential to expose an acquirer's liabilities from the target's use of open-source code.

    Palamida is another player in the open source compliance software arena.

     

    February 13, 2007

    IP Bankers, Exchanges & Others - an Overview

    Intellectual property (such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, and domain names, or “IP”) is becoming recognized as a new and separate asset class.  At the same time, a new group of intermediaries and brokers has emerged to facilitate deals.  Most of these companies focus on patents, because that’s where the money is, thanks to a series of rulings from the Federal Circuit upholding patent rights.

    Some of the players include:

    IP bankers.  These include Ocean Tomo, which introduced live public auctions of patent portfolios.  According to its web site, Ocean Tomo’s April 2006 auction resulted in over $8.5 million of transactions and a follow-on auction in October 2006 resulted in over $23 million of transactions.  Its next auction is scheduled in April 2007 in Chicago.  Inflexion Point Strategy is a more private shop run by Ron Laurie, an industry veteran and former intellectual property partner at the large law firm, Skadden Arps.

    Online exchanges.  These include yet2.com in Massachusetts, Tynax  and 2xfr  by PatentCafe in California.  My understanding is that the transactions are too large and complex to be completed fully online, and that the online exchanges serve more as a meeting ground for deals that get documented and completed offline.  Other exchanges are listed here.

    Some online exchanges focus instead on incentivizing new research efforts, rather than on transactions for existing intellectual property, .  These include Innocentive and Ninesigma.

    Some IP transactions are even completed over eBay for patents, domain names and entire websites.  Dedicated exchanges exist for domain name resales, such as Sedo.com  and The Domain Name Aftermarket (offered by one of the leading domain name registrars, GoDaddy.com).

    IP brokers.  These include IMC Licensing, a sell-side broker of consumer brand (trademark) rights for licensing, and Gordon Brothers Group on both the buy and sell side.  Another broker, breedersrights.com, specializes in plant patents and plant breeding rights.

    IP brokers generally focus on IP assets, as compared to traditional investment banks and business brokers (such as brokers who are members of the International Business Brokers Association or the California Association of Business Brokers) who handle sales of stock or the entire spectrum of assets of a business or company.

    Of course, literary, motion picture and sports agents (such as International Creative Management, Inc. (ICM)  and Creative Artists Agency) have operated for years as brokers of copyrights to books, movies, songs, music and other entertainment and sports content. The movie Jerry Maguire, with its famous line “Show me the money,” is the story of a frenetic sports agent.

    Brokers for patents should be distinguished from  “inventor agents,” “invention developers” or “invention promoters,” which are regulated under the laws of several states, including California (see California Business and Professions Code Section 22370 and following), due to consumer issues faced by individual inventors for invention marketing services.  (Articles for individual inventors seeking to protect themselves are available from Inventor’s Digest magazine and the United Inventors Association.) 

    IP Lenders / IP Securitization.  Other companies, such as Licent Capital and Copient Capital, arrange for loans based on intellectual property or a royalty stream from a license agreement.  On a more sophisticated level, IP portfolios and their royalties (e.g., from music catalogs) have been securitized as collateral for publicly traded debt.  For more, see Securitization News.  This site  offers older articles specifically about IP securitization.

    Valuation and Escrow Consultants.  As with real estate, many firms offer valuation and escrow services.  IP auctioneer Ocean Tomo also provides due diligence and valuation services, as well as “patent ratings,” a statistical measure of patent portfolio quality.  Some of the domain name exchanges include a basic escrow as part of the transaction. Royaltystat.com  offers a subscription-based database of royalty rates and license agreements compiled from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Edgar Archive.

    Buyers.  There are many new buyers too.  Some of the new buyers have been labeled as “patent trolls” because they purchase or create patent rights solely for the purpose of licensing them to third parties, often threatening or pursuing litigation to extract licensing royalties from operating companies.  Recently, some buyers have been purchasing rights to older music and seeking royalties for its use in sampled music; they’ve been termed “sample trolls.”

    The companies and resources listed above are for information only, not endorsement.

    February 12, 2007

    Second Anniversary of the Boadwee Law Office

    The Boadwee Law Office celebrates its second anniversary!  The following press release was issued today: 

    Boadwee Law Office Celebrates Second Anniversary in Cupertino

    Firm Advises on Internet, Software and Technology Contracts For Innovative Companies and Individuals

    CUPERTINO, California, February 12, 2007 – The Boadwee Law Office, a business law firm in Cupertino, California, completed its second year in business, focusing on internet, software and technology contracts.  Founded in 2005 by veteran software and internet industry lawyer Harry Boadwee, the firm supports clients who include major corporations, startups funded by venture capital, and entrepreneurs who finance or “bootstrap” their enterprises with their own savings.  Many of these entrepreneurs are immigrants with technical expertise, business savvy and high ambitions.

    “I love practicing business law in Cupertino,” said Boadwee, founder and attorney at law.  “The area is a hotbed of innovation and creativity.  Industry leaders such as Apple, Inc., Symantec Corp., and open source data base pioneer MySQL Inc. are just steps away from the city center.  VC-funded startups are thriving.  But the creativity doesn’t end there.  The leaders of tomorrow are designing their products and their business plans on their kitchen tables and in their garages in Cupertino and nearby towns.  It’s exciting to meet new business founders who believe in their companies and their dreams so much that they reach into their own pocketbooks to bring them to life.”

    For additional information about the Boadwee Law Office, contact Harry Boadwee at (408) 253-6100 or visit www.BoadweeLaw.com.

    ABOUT THE BOADWEE LAW OFFICE

    Founder and attorney at law Harry Boadwee has more than 18 years of experience successfully practicing corporate and intellectual property law.  Before opening the firm in January 2005, Boadwee was Director and Assistant General Counsel of Intuit Inc., an S&P 500 company known for its Quicken®, QuickBooks®, and TurboTax® software.  He was previously associated with Fenwick & West LLP, a leading Silicon Valley technology law firm, and Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, a major international law firm based in New York City.   The Boadwee Law Office is located at 20370 Town Center Lane, Suite 100, Cupertino, California 95014, telephone: (408) 253-6100, fax: (408) 253-6200. The firm’s web site, www.BoadweeLaw.com, provides useful free resources for entrepreneurs and other business people who negotiate and close technology deals.

    February 09, 2007

    Hybrid Software Business Models

    Knowledge@Wharton has an interesting perspective on new softwawre business models, in Why Software Business Models of the Future Probably Won't Come in a Box.

    Kartik Hosanagar, an operations and information management professor at Wharton, believes that "a hybrid business model -- consisting of parts of traditional licensing, on-demand, ad supported and even open source" will emerge and be the "winning model of the future". 

    My take: I generally agree.  I supported multiple hybrid Software-Internet business models when I worked at Intuit.  But this transition won't be easy.  Just as Google Adsense, Craig's List free classifieds, and the general move to performance-based marketing on the internet have confounded the newspaper industry, there are going to be wrenching changes ahead for business people who can't broaden their perspective. 

    And, that doesn't even begin to raise the equally significant mindset change needed to cope with mobility (an all-the-time, everywhere wireless mobile environment).

    February 07, 2007

    New Book on Information Security Law

    A fellow lawyer in Cupertino, Stephen Wu, has co-authored a recently published book on information security law. 

    The book is named Information Security: A Legal, Business and Technical Handbook, by Kimberly Kiefer, Stephen Wu, Ben Wilson, and Randy Sabett.

    According to the American Bar Association (ABA), the book "provides fundamental information on how to assess security risk, legal requirements for information security, and examples of best practices to avoid the many different kinds of security breaches. The book also discusses liability stemming from security breaches and provides pointers to other sources of standards, guidelines, and best practices. This Handbook will give clear and comprehensive guidance to anyone who wants a basic understanding of information security threats and the legal issues related to them."

    February 06, 2007

    AS-IS - Enough Already

    So, yes, the comments on this blog are furnished AS-IS, and even WITH ALL FAULTS.  And, the comments on this blog are not intended as legal advice, which I only provide to clients who formally engage me as their lawyer.  See the Terms of Use on my web site.

    I admit it.  You will probably find a few mistakes and other embarrassing slips of the tongue here.  I'm sure you'll let me know.  Here's how to contact me.

    AS-IS - More

    For those who enjoy reading statutes (many lawyers, virtually no businesspeople): the expression "AS-IS" comes from Section 2316(3)(a) of the California Commercial Code, which states, "Unless the circumstances indicate otherwise, all implied warranties are excluded by expressions like "as is," "with all faults" or other language which in common understanding calls the buyer's attention to the exclusion of warranties and makes plain that there is no implied warranty."

    Translation: if the seller says the product, or the software, or the website, is sold "AS-IS" then it's "BUYER BEWARE" for the buyer.

    Mostly anyway.  Unless, as the statute says, "circumstances indicate otherwise."  Circumstances might indicate otherwise if the seller states something along the lines of: "This software is licensed AS-IS, but I guarantee that it will run on Windows Vista."

    February 04, 2007

    Why AS-IS?

    Why AS-IS?

    It's one of the shortest expressions in commercial contracts and licenses that I know.  And it's legalese, without really sounding like legalese.  And its meaning is (mostly) self-evident, even to people who aren't lawyers. 

     

    February 03, 2007

    Welcome to the AS-IS Blog!

    Welcome to the AS-IS blog, where I plan to discuss ecommerce, internet, software and technology contracts and licenses, as well as the laws affecting internet and software companies, both large and small.  My focus is on California law and Silicon Valley.

     This blog is sponsored by the Boadwee Law Office.  Please visit that site to learn more about me (attorney Harry Boadwee).