Monthly Archives: September 2009

Using Contracts to Deal with Unknowns: Part 1 –“Known Unknowns” (Technology Law Letter #8)

In this Newsletter

  • Using Contracts to Deal with Unknowns: Part 1 – “Known Unknowns”
  • From My Blog
  • Ask Harry Boadwee

Using Contracts to Deal with Unknowns: Part 1 –“Known Unknowns”

Business people deal with unknown facts and circumstances in contracts all the time. Contracts allocate the responsibility for unknowns to one party or the other.  Most often, this means cash out of pocket for a costly unforeseen event.

In this article, you’ll learn common ways to deal with two types of unknowns in a contract: the “known unknowns” and the “unknown unknowns.”  Most people focus on the usual known unknowns, even though the unknown unknowns can have huge consequences.  We’ll look at both.

For “known unknowns,” you can identify the general category of uncertainty, but not the outcome.   You may know the probability of an outcome, or rely on experience or “gut instinct.”  For example, if people are visiting a factory, the risky outcome is that “someone could get hurt.”  Or, if you are buying some property, “the seller may not have all the necessary rights.”

In a contract, known unknowns can be addressed through representations, warranties, and indemnities crafted to cover the categories of risk you can identify.

A representation is a statement of fact from one party to the other party in a contract that the facts are true at a certain point in time.  For example, you could make a representation to the other party that you own all rights to a piece of property on the date the contract is signed.

A warranty is an ongoing promise in a contract that stated facts will remain true in the future.  For example, you could give a warranty that you will continue to own all rights to the property while the contract remains in force.   In other words, you won’t sell the property during the contract term.

If a representation or warranty turns out not to be true, the party receiving it generally can terminate the contract, sue for damages or seek other remedies.

An indemnity is “a contract by which one engages to save another from a legal consequence of the conduct of one of the parties…. ” in the words of California Civil Code Section 2772.  “To save another from a legal consequence” most often means that one party must defend a lawsuit (and pay attorney’s fees and damages awarded) if a third party sues the other party to the contract.  For example, if you have a contract with another company and your employees visit the other company’s factory, then the other company could indemnify you against personal injury lawsuits by your employees if your employees are injured during the factory visit.  For more, see the definition of “indemnity” at http://boadweelaw.com/glossary/i.html.

The continued existence of both parties is a known unknown. Business people often neglect these “existential” risks, especially in smaller contracts, but they can affect almost every deal.  Some of these risks can be dealt with under contract law, and others cannot.  Other law, such as bankruptcy, trusts & estates or even family law, may apply.  A party may be sold to another company (change of control) , or may go bankrupt and out of business.  Contract provisions can deal with the change of control (e.g., terminating the contract upon a change of control).   Because bankruptcy law can override almost any contract, that law must be considered if a party may go out of business.  If the other party is an individual person, you should consider the possible impact of personal bankruptcy, or severe disability or death (where trusts & estates or family law may come in).  For example, personal risks are important in shareholder or partnership agreements.  Other existential risks, such as seizure by a foreign government or significant new regulations, are more rare.

In the next issue, I’ll discuss how to deal with “unknown unknowns” in a contract.

From My Blog

  • Enter the Hyperwrap Agreement: Turning the Page in Online Contracts.  This posting discusses a new type of online contract recently recognized by the courts, which may be useful where a “clickwrap” agreement is not practical.
    (http://tinyurl.com/hyperwrap)

Ask Harry Boadwee

I invite your questions, comments and suggestions for this newsletter!

If you have a general question about technology transactions, contracts, negotiations, or software or internet law, [contact me].

I’ll try to answer as many questions as I can, in particular, short questions that may interest many readers of this newsletter.

All the best,

-  Harry

Please visit my newsletter archives at www.BoadweeLaw.com/newsletter.html

Harry Boadwee’s Technology Law Letter is published by the Boadwee Law Office, legal advisers to innovative companies in the fields of technology transactions, software and internet law.

I appreciate your referrals.  Please pass along or forward this newsletter (without modification).  For other uses, contact me.

To receive your own subscription to this newsletter, visit www.BoadweeLaw.com/subscribe or send an email to Subscribe@BoadweeLaw.com

Copyright © 2009 Boadwee Law Office.  All rights reserved.  20370 Town Center Lane, Suite 100, Cupertino, CA 95014.  Tel: (408) 253-6100.  Fax: (408) 253-6200.

This Newsletter is for general information purposes only, and is not provided in connection with rendering of legal or other professional advice.  It is subject to the Terms of Use of the Boadwee Law Office (www.BoadweeLaw.com/terms.html) and may be Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions.

Enter the Hyperwrap Agreement: A New Page in Online Contracts

Software and internet contracts for years have been created by means of “shrinkwrap,” “clickwrap” and even “browsewrap” agreements (although the enforceability of “browsewrap” agreements is somewhat doubtful). Two recent cases from Illinois courts now recognize a type of contract called a “hyperwrap” agreement.  For the business implications, you can scroll to the bottom of thisContinue Reading